linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 36/57] irqdomain: spmi: Switch to irq_domain_create

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1de0fc4c00120ee6541693d13f7b8f9c@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:49:22 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@...nel.org>, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: maz@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 36/57] irqdomain: spmi: Switch to irq_domain_create_tree()

Quoting Jiri Slaby (SUSE) (2025-03-19 02:29:29)
> irq_domain_add_tree() is going away as being obsolete now. Switch to
> the preferred irq_domain_create_tree(). That differs in the first
> parameter: It takes more generic struct fwnode_handle instead of struct
> device_node. Therefore, of_fwnode_handle() is added around the
> parameter.
> 
> Note some of the users can likely use dev->fwnode directly instead of
> indirect of_fwnode_handle(dev->of_node). But dev->fwnode is not
> guaranteed to be set for all, so this has to be investigated on case to
> case basis (by people who can actually test with the HW).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@...nel.org>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> ---

Applied to spmi-next