[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n53ypGBXAt3frrbfAsbJZEkxK4BCB0+3MWOFRxZ9E+6P9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:55:27 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>, chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org>,
Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@...omium.org>, Ćukasz Bartosik <ukaszb@...omium.org>,
Jameson Thies <jthies@...gle.com>, Andrei Kuchynski <akuchynski@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: No pending status
means attention
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2025-04-22 06:38:17)
> On 16/04/2025 03:02, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > If we aren't expecting a status update when
> > cros_typec_displayport_status_update() is called then we're handling an
> > attention message, like HPD high/low or IRQ. Call
> > typec_altmode_attention() in this case so that HPD signaling works in
> > the DP altmode driver.
>
> Fixes?
I didn't put a fixes because it only matters to make the displayport
altmode driver work with the typec port which isn't used so far on DT
platforms. I view it as a new feature, not a fix for an existing
feature, because we don't use the altmode driver.
It also seems like it was intentional on ACPI systems to only handle
mode entry/exit and not HPD signaling per my reading of the mailing
list.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists