lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29d15e93-8f5e-4cec-97b8-8592beb01d6a@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 09:09:29 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
 Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
 Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
 Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>,
 David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] Revert "dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Add
 qcom,apq8064-mmss-sfpb"

On 28/04/2025 09:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 08:47:01PM GMT, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> For some reason Lee has mis-squashed two commits, picking up one chunk
>> from the first patch and one chunk from the second one. Rather than
>> trying to fix it, revert commit 2c8de7df7418 ("dt-bindings: mfd: syscon:
>> Add qcom,apq8064-mmss-sfpb").
> 
> I don't understand: that commit looks like direct, proper result for
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250318-fix-nexus-4-v2-5-bcedd1406790@oss.qualcomm.com/
> so where is squashing two commits? The diff markers have offset by few
> lines, but it's still just few lines and they do not matter - there is
> no diff/patch mismatch from that point of view.

Ah, difference in compatibles. I see the error. Anyway, I don't think
revert is correct. Just add missing compatibles.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ