linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC/WIP v2 3/9] media: dt-bindings: Add qcom,sa8775p-camss

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250428-imperial-manul-of-aurora-ba1755@kuoka>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 09:38:19 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Vikram Sharma <quic_vikramsa@...cinc.com>
Cc: rfoss@...nel.org, todor.too@...il.com, bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org, 
	mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, 
	cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/WIP v2 3/9] media: dt-bindings: Add qcom,sa8775p-camss

On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 12:31:29PM GMT, Vikram Sharma wrote:
> Add bindings for qcom,sa8775p-camss to support the camera subsystem
> on SA8775P platform.

Describe the hardware, e.g. why this does not have supplies, why and how
this is different than all other camss.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Vikram Sharma <quic_vikramsa@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/media/qcom,sa8775p-camss.yaml    | 352 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 352 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sa8775p-camss.yaml
> 

With fixes in commit msg:

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

---

<form letter>
This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags
are being ignored. If you know the process, you can skip it (please do
not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions intended).
If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof