| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20250428062707.GA26271@green245>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 11:57:07 +0530
From: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@...sung.com>
To: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, axboe@...nel.dk, gost.dev@...sung.com,
nitheshshetty@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iov_iter: Use iov_offset for length calculation in
iov_iter_aligned_bvec
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 01:23:10PM +0530, Nitesh Shetty wrote:
> If iov_offset is non-zero, then we need to consider iov_offset in length
> calculation, otherwise we might pass smaller IOs such as 512 bytes, in
> below scenario[1].
> This issue is reproducible using lib-uring test/fixed-seg.c application
> with fixed buffer on a 512 LBA formatted device.
> Fixes รข3639f96f24a121ec9f037981b81daf5a8d60a
>
This needs a proper fixes tag format
Fixes: <12 characters of the SHA-1 ID> ("commit description")
With that
Reviewed-by: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@...sung.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists