[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250428-enable-rtc-v4-2-2b2f7e3f9349@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:06:48 +0200
From: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] rtc: Fix offset calculation for .start_secs < 0
The comparison
rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max
has a signed left-hand side and an unsigned right-hand side.
So the comparison might become true for negative start_secs which is
interpreted as a (possibly very large) positive value.
As a negative value can never be bigger than an unsigned value
the correct representation of the (mathematical) comparison
rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max
in C is:
rtc->start_secs >= 0 && rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max
Use that to fix the offset calculation currently used in the
rtc-mt6397 driver.
Fixes: 989515647e783 ("rtc: Add one offset seconds to expand RTC range")
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
---
drivers/rtc/class.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/class.c b/drivers/rtc/class.c
index e31fa0ad127e9545afac745a621d4ccbcd5fca28..a0afdeaac270f026734be8785e8ed7e1272b2348 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/class.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/class.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static void rtc_device_get_offset(struct rtc_device *rtc)
*
* Otherwise the offset seconds should be 0.
*/
- if (rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max ||
+ if ((rtc->start_secs >= 0 && rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max) ||
rtc->start_secs + range_secs - 1 < rtc->range_min)
rtc->offset_secs = rtc->start_secs - rtc->range_min;
else if (rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_min)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists