linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] platform/mellanox: mlxbf-pmc: Support additional PMC blocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <174593801973.3519.12131064364710157373.b4-ty@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 17:46:59 +0300
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, 
 Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...dia.com>, 
 David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com>, 
 Shravan Kumar Ramani <shravankr@...dia.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] platform/mellanox: mlxbf-pmc: Support
 additional PMC blocks

On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 04:31:03 -0400, Shravan Kumar Ramani wrote:

> Add list of events and counters from the following blocks: APT (ARM Processor
> Tile), GGA (Global Generic Accelerator), MSN (Memory Stasher and Navigator),
> EMI (External Memory Interface) and PRNF (PCIe Request Node).
> If any of the fields populated from the ACPI table (like apt_num) cannot be
> read, assign the corresponding block count to be 0 instead of failing probe
> to maintain compatibility with older firmware.
> 
> [...]


Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local
review-ilpo-next branch. Note it will show up in the public
platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-next branch only once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.

The list of commits applied:
[1/1] platform/mellanox: mlxbf-pmc: Support additional PMC blocks
      commit: ffde61d15f16aa0e59ef6fca92cb362c21956a77

--
 i.