[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250429-effects-subscript-58eb41737816@spud>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:31:51 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: input: touchscreen: goodix: Add
no-reset-pull-up property
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 11:56:11AM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> This should be added for boards where there is no pull-up on the reset pin,
> as the driver will otherwise switch the reset signal to high-impedance to
> save power, which obviously not safe without pull-up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/goodix.yaml | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/goodix.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/goodix.yaml
> index eb4992f708b70fef93bd4b59b9565123f7c6ad5d..21ac13046b6e021eeb403d854aabc945801dd29f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/goodix.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/goodix.yaml
> @@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ properties:
> reset-gpios:
> maxItems: 1
>
> + goodix,no-reset-pull-up:
> + type: boolean
> + description: There is no pull-up on reset pin
I have to wonder, why are these system using the reset property if the
reset is not usable? Shouldn't the property be omitted?
> +
> AVDD28-supply:
> description: Analog power supply regulator on AVDD28 pin
>
>
> --
> 2.49.0
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists