[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg34q=Mp7abB1zgL1GnXJ9Z_dOoZiBxqyXRtHipCpuyiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:22:59 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@...pl>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitops/32: Convert variable_ffs() and fls() zero-case
handling to C
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 at 19:00, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
> Now, question: can we just use __builtin_*() for these? I think gcc should always generate inline code for these on x86.
Yeah, I think we can just use __builtin_ffs() directly and get rid of
all the games.
Not all gcc builtins are great: I did a bugzilla about gcc ctzl some time ago:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106471
but for ffs() that does sound like it's the simplest thing to do.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists