[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kF+XFFMzFYV_O6kVK1oEaWca5iw4r6f8CU9OvSnRMzfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 21:41:07 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>, Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>, "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] perf test demangle-rust: Add Rust demangling test
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 8:59 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> The test cases are listed examples in:
> https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/symbol-mangling/v0.html
>
> This test was previously part of a different Rust v0 demangler:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250129193037.573431-1-irogers@google.com/
Hmm... this sounds like it comes from the previous demangler, but it
isn't in-tree, right?
I don't know if reusing those examples count as "code" or not, but
just in case: the docs (and the original RFC) seem to be under
Apache/MIT like the rest.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists