[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mqY1wxJmeSx7VNiSYz7rNk4c+dZ7ve6rvjM+kLpnWXXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 22:55:14 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Ayush Singh <ayush@...gleboard.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>, Deepak Khatri <lorforlinux@...gleboard.org>,
Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...gleboard.org>, Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rust: kernel: device: Add devm_of_platform_populate/depopulate
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 6:07 PM Ayush Singh <ayush@...gleboard.org> wrote:
>
> I am okay with maintaining the patches for Rust side out of tree,
> because well, at this point, it's a much smaller list than the number of
> out of tree patches I need to have for the C side to be able to show a
> semi complete connector setup anyway. And nothing is going to be merged
In general, abstractions are not upstreamed unless there is an
expected user in-tree, i.e. the relevant maintainers already need to
agree on merging the user, and just having something out-of-tree does
not count, see:
https://rust-for-linux.com/contributing#submitting-new-abstractions-and-modules
Thus, given what you say about the C side, it does sound like the
first step will be there anyway.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists