[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250429215604.GE4439@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 23:56:04 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Cristian Prundeanu <cpru@...zon.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Hazem Mohamed Abuelfotoh <abuehaze@...zon.com>,
Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Geoff Blake <blakgeof@...zon.com>, Csaba Csoma <csabac@...zon.com>,
Bjoern Doebel <doebel@...zon.com>,
Gautham Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@....com>,
Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...cle.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: EEVDF regression still exists
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 04:38:17PM -0500, Cristian Prundeanu wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Here are the latest results for the EEVDF impact on database workloads.
> The regression introduced in kernel 6.6 still persists and doesn't look
> like it is improving.
Well, I was under the impression it had actually been solved :-(
My understanding from the last round was that Prateek and co had it
sorted -- with the caveat being that you had to stick SCHED_BATCH in at
the right place in MySQL start scripts or somesuch.
Prateek, Gautham?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists