[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d64116c5-4851-4658-9b68-fdba3886b4cd@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:53:35 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, corbet@....net, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, david@...hat.com,
baohua@...nel.org, ryan.roberts@....com, willy@...radead.org,
peterx@...hat.com, ziy@...dia.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
usamaarif642@...il.com, sunnanyong@...wei.com, vishal.moola@...il.com,
thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com, yang@...amperecomputing.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com, raquini@...hat.com,
dev.jain@....com, anshuman.khandual@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
tiwai@...e.de, will@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, jack@...e.cz,
cl@...two.org, jglisse@...gle.com, surenb@...gle.com, zokeefe@...gle.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, rientjes@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] khugepaged: skip collapsing mTHP to smaller
orders
On 2025/4/28 23:44, Nico Pache wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 1:49 AM Baolin Wang
> <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2025/4/17 08:02, Nico Pache wrote:
>>> khugepaged may try to collapse a mTHP to a smaller mTHP, resulting in
>>> some pages being unmapped. Skip these cases until we have a way to check
>>> if its ok to collapse to a smaller mTHP size (like in the case of a
>>> partially mapped folio).
>>>
>>> This patch is inspired by Dev Jain's work on khugepaged mTHP support [1].
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241216165105.56185-11-dev.jain@arm.com/
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>> mm/khugepaged.c | 7 ++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> index ece39fd71fe6..383aff12cd43 100644
>>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> @@ -625,7 +625,12 @@ static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> folio = page_folio(page);
>>> VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_anon(folio), folio);
>>>
>>> - /* See hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(). */
>>> + if (order != HPAGE_PMD_ORDER && folio_order(folio) >= order) {
>>> + result = SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE;
>>> + goto out;
>>> + }
>>
>> Should we also add this check in hpage_collapse_scan_pmd() to abort the
>> scan early?
> No I dont think so, we can't abort there because we dont know the
> attempted collapse order, and we dont want to miss potential mTHP
> collapses (by bailing out early and not populating the bitmap).
OK. That makes sense.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists