[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBAnKZCUZWyEJhfS@fedora>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 09:11:05 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] selftests: ublk: kublk: build with -Werror iff
CONFIG_WERROR=y
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 05:10:20PM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
> Compiler warnings can catch bugs at compile time. They can also produce
> annoying false positives. Due to this duality, the kernel provides
> CONFIG_WERROR so that the developer can choose whether or not they want
> compiler warnings to fail the build. Use this same config options to
> control whether or not warnings in building kublk fail its build.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/ublk/Makefile | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/Makefile
> index ec4624a283bce2ebeed80509be6573c1b7a3623d..86474cfe8d03b2df3f8c9bc1a5902701a0f72f58 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/Makefile
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> -CFLAGS += -O3 -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall -I $(top_srcdir)
> +CONFIG = $(top_srcdir)/include/config/auto.conf
> +WERROR = $(if $(shell grep CONFIG_WERROR=y ${CONFIG}),-Werror,)
> +CFLAGS += -O3 -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall ${WERROR} -I $(top_srcdir)
> LDLIBS += -lpthread -lm -luring
I think it isn't good to reuse kernel CONFIG_WERROR for test code.
But it can be done in the following way by passing 'WERROR=1' to make
command line:
+ifneq ($(WERROR),0)
+ CFLAGS += -Werror
+endif
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists