linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kcov: rust: add flags for KCOV with Rust

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72mazsVZxXaw6RD66CfFXRR-sHWf6eVr3jke1mWxBcrTBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 18:12:00 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com>
Cc: Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, 
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>, 
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, 
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, 
	Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, 
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, 
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kcov: rust: add flags for KCOV with Rust

On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 5:52 PM Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> `kernel.o` I think we should probably keep at least for now, because
> it's kernel-created source that we'd still like proved out. In a
> theoretical world where Rust has become more normalized in a decade,
> we could filter it out to refocus fuzzers on driver code rather than
> bindings, but right now the bindings themselves are worth fuzzing IMO.

Agreed, I think we should definitely keep `kernel` for a while.

Cheers,
Miguel