[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250430165210.321273-2-olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 18:52:08 +0200
From: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>
To: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
Arnaud Pouliquen
<arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark
Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai
<tiwai@...e.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre
Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
CC: <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: stm32: sai: skip useless iterations on kernel rate loop
the frequency of the kernel clock must be greater than or equal to the
bitclock rate. When searching for a convenient kernel clock rate in
stm32_sai_set_parent_rate() function, it is useless to continue the loop
below bitclock rate, as it will result in a invalid kernel clock rate.
Change the loop output condition.
Fixes: b1d2e4067dc6 ("ASoC: stm32: sai: add stm32mp25 support")
Signed-off-by: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>
---
sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c b/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c
index e8c1abf1ae0a..4d018b4bc3f0 100644
--- a/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c
+++ b/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c
@@ -409,11 +409,11 @@ static int stm32_sai_set_parent_rate(struct stm32_sai_sub_data *sai,
unsigned int rate)
{
struct platform_device *pdev = sai->pdev;
- unsigned int sai_ck_rate, sai_ck_max_rate, sai_curr_rate, sai_new_rate;
+ unsigned int sai_ck_rate, sai_ck_max_rate, sai_ck_min_rate, sai_curr_rate, sai_new_rate;
int div, ret;
/*
- * Set maximum expected kernel clock frequency
+ * Set minimum and maximum expected kernel clock frequency
* - mclk on or spdif:
* f_sai_ck = MCKDIV * mclk-fs * fs
* Here typical 256 ratio is assumed for mclk-fs
@@ -423,13 +423,16 @@ static int stm32_sai_set_parent_rate(struct stm32_sai_sub_data *sai,
* Set constraint MCKDIV * FRL <= 256, to ensure MCKDIV is in available range
* f_sai_ck = sai_ck_max_rate * pow_of_two(FRL) / 256
*/
+ sai_ck_min_rate = rate * 256;
if (!(rate % SAI_RATE_11K))
sai_ck_max_rate = SAI_MAX_SAMPLE_RATE_11K * 256;
else
sai_ck_max_rate = SAI_MAX_SAMPLE_RATE_8K * 256;
- if (!sai->sai_mclk && !STM_SAI_PROTOCOL_IS_SPDIF(sai))
+ if (!sai->sai_mclk && !STM_SAI_PROTOCOL_IS_SPDIF(sai)) {
+ sai_ck_min_rate = rate * sai->fs_length;
sai_ck_max_rate /= DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(256, roundup_pow_of_two(sai->fs_length));
+ }
/*
* Request exclusivity, as the clock is shared by SAI sub-blocks and by
@@ -472,7 +475,7 @@ static int stm32_sai_set_parent_rate(struct stm32_sai_sub_data *sai,
/* Try a lower frequency */
div++;
sai_ck_rate = sai_ck_max_rate / div;
- } while (sai_ck_rate > rate);
+ } while (sai_ck_rate >= sai_ck_min_rate);
/* No accurate rate found */
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to find an accurate rate");
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists