linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/32] kselftest harness and nolibc compatibility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202504301153.E2D0C4ED@keescook>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:53:57 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/32] kselftest harness and nolibc compatibility

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 02:06:34PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 4/22/25 02:51, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:48:28AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:00:24AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > > Nolibc is useful for selftests as the test programs can be very small,
> > > > and compiled with just a kernel crosscompiler, without userspace support.
> > > > Currently nolibc is only usable with kselftest.h, not the more
> > > > convenient to use kselftest_harness.h
> > > > This series provides this compatibility by adding new features to nolibc
> > > > and removing the usage of problematic features from the harness.
> > > > 
> > > > The first half of the series are changes to the harness, the second one
> > > > are for nolibc. Both parts are very independent and should go through
> > > > different trees.
> > > 
> > > I need a few nolibc bits of this series (snprintf() and prep patches) to base
> > > further patches on. For that I'd like to pick up all the nolibc patches from
> > > this series through the nolibc tree. They got Acks from Willy.
> > > 
> > > Any objections?
> > 
> > No objection on my side!
> > 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Kees, do you have any comments on this series? If you are okay
> with it, I would like to apply this for next.

Fine by me! :)

-- 
Kees Cook