linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the driver-core tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025043005-default-hurray-7567@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:56:23 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the driver-core tree

On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 08:34:39PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 30, 2025 9:47:26 AM CEST Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The following commit is also in the pm tree as a different commit (but
> > the same patch):
> > 
> >   142ba31d8b4a ("PM: wakeup: Do not expose 4 device wakeup source APIs")
> > 
> > This is commit
> > 
> >   150b374b9ff9 ("PM: wakeup: Define four low-level functions as static")
> > 
> > in the pm tree.
> 
> I'll drop this from the PM tree, but this technically is PM material.
> 

Sorry about that, my fault.  I can revert it if that makes more sense.
Which ever you want is fine.

thanks,

greg k-h