[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <174604807591.2105045.17581520822514602555.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:21:18 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Neill Kapron <nkapron@...gle.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] selftests/seccomp: fix syscall_restart test for arm compat
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 09:40:58 +0000, Neill Kapron wrote:
> The inconsistencies in the systcall ABI between arm and arm-compat can
> can cause a failure in the syscall_restart test due to the logic
> attempting to work around the differences. The 'machine' field for an
> ARM64 device running in compat mode can report 'armv8l' or 'armv8b'
> which matches with the string 'arm' when only examining the first three
> characters of the string.
>
> [...]
Applied to for-next/seccomp, thanks!
[1/1] selftests/seccomp: fix syscall_restart test for arm compat
https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/797002deed03
Take care,
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists