[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250430225234.2676781-9-csander@purestorage.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:52:33 -0600
From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 8/9] ublk: check UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV in ublk_abort_queue()
ublk_abort_queue() currently checks whether the UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE flag
is cleared to tell whether to abort each ublk_io in the queue. But it's
possible for a ublk_io to not be ACTIVE but also not have a request in
flight, such as when no fetch request has yet been submitted for a tag
or when a fetch request is cancelled. So ublk_abort_queue() must
additionally check for an inflight request.
Simplify this code by checking for UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV instead,
which indicates precisely whether a request is currently inflight.
Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 483205a0dfe8..97c61c0bf964 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1609,20 +1609,15 @@ static void ublk_abort_queue(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ubq->q_depth; i++) {
struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[i];
- if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE)) {
+ if (io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV) {
struct request *rq;
- /*
- * Either we fail the request or ublk_rq_task_work_cb
- * will do it
- */
rq = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(ub->tag_set.tags[ubq->q_id], i);
- if (rq && blk_mq_request_started(rq))
- __ublk_fail_req(ubq, io, rq);
+ __ublk_fail_req(ubq, io, rq);
}
}
}
/* Must be called when queue is frozen */
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists