[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250429235122.537321-29-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:51:14 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
kdevops@...ts.linux.dev,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
tytso@....edu,
jack@...e.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 29/37] fs/jbd2: use sleeping version of __find_get_block()
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
[ Upstream commit f76d4c28a46a9260d85e00dafc8f46d369365d33 ]
Convert to the new nonatomic flavor to benefit from potential
performance benefits and adapt in the future vs migration such
that semantics are kept.
- jbd2_journal_revoke(): can sleep (has might_sleep() in the beginning)
- jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(): only used from do_get_write_access() and
do_get_create_access() which do sleep. So can sleep.
- jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags() - only called from journal commit code
which sleeps. So can sleep.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Link: https://kdevops.org/ext4/v6.15-rc2.html # [0]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aAAEvcrmREWa1SKF@bombadil.infradead.org/ # [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250418015921.132400-6-dave@stgolabs.net
Tested-by: kdevops@...ts.linux.dev
Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/jbd2/revoke.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
index ce63d5fde9c3a..f68fc8c255f00 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
@@ -345,7 +345,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_revoke(handle_t *handle, unsigned long long blocknr,
bh = bh_in;
if (!bh) {
- bh = __find_get_block(bdev, blocknr, journal->j_blocksize);
+ bh = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bdev, blocknr,
+ journal->j_blocksize);
if (bh)
BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "found on hash");
}
@@ -355,7 +356,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_revoke(handle_t *handle, unsigned long long blocknr,
/* If there is a different buffer_head lying around in
* memory anywhere... */
- bh2 = __find_get_block(bdev, blocknr, journal->j_blocksize);
+ bh2 = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bdev, blocknr,
+ journal->j_blocksize);
if (bh2) {
/* ... and it has RevokeValid status... */
if (bh2 != bh && buffer_revokevalid(bh2))
@@ -466,7 +468,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(handle_t *handle, struct journal_head *jh)
* state machine will get very upset later on. */
if (need_cancel) {
struct buffer_head *bh2;
- bh2 = __find_get_block(bh->b_bdev, bh->b_blocknr, bh->b_size);
+ bh2 = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bh->b_bdev, bh->b_blocknr,
+ bh->b_size);
if (bh2) {
if (bh2 != bh)
clear_buffer_revoked(bh2);
@@ -495,9 +498,9 @@ void jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal_t *journal)
struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *record;
struct buffer_head *bh;
record = (struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *)list_entry;
- bh = __find_get_block(journal->j_fs_dev,
- record->blocknr,
- journal->j_blocksize);
+ bh = __find_get_block_nonatomic(journal->j_fs_dev,
+ record->blocknr,
+ journal->j_blocksize);
if (bh) {
clear_buffer_revoked(bh);
__brelse(bh);
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists