[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250430083526.4276-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:35:26 +0300
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: Fix lock symmetry in pci_slot_unlock()
The commit a4e772898f8b ("PCI: Add missing bridge lock to
pci_bus_lock()") made the lock function to call depend on
dev->subordinate but left pci_slot_unlock() unmodified creating locking
asymmetry compared with pci_slot_lock().
Move pci_dev_unlock() inside an else branch to match the logic in
pci_slot_lock().
Fixes: a4e772898f8b ("PCI: Add missing bridge lock to pci_bus_lock()")
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/pci/pci.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 4d7c9f64ea24..26507aa906d7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -5542,7 +5542,8 @@ static void pci_slot_unlock(struct pci_slot *slot)
continue;
if (dev->subordinate)
pci_bus_unlock(dev->subordinate);
- pci_dev_unlock(dev);
+ else
+ pci_dev_unlock(dev);
}
}
base-commit: 0af2f6be1b4281385b618cb86ad946eded089ac8
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists