linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl-samsung tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdaxTJ96hpJqs=xWVD4gSLdgc=m9uq+rbJKrJL+jgC645g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:47:32 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl-samsung tree

On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:29 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 30/04/2025 09:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The following commit is also in the pinctrl tree as a different commit
> > (but the same patch):
> >
> >   0a5b9be31f78 ("pinctrl: samsung: use new GPIO line value setter callbacks")
> >
> > This is commit
> >
> >   9e4c444755b1 ("pinctrl: samsung: use new GPIO line value setter callbacks")
> >
>
> Thanks, I will drop mine.

Thanks Krzysztof, my bad I didn't think about splitting the series across
submaintainers, I should have. I hope this doesn't collide with anything
in your tree.

Yours,
Linus Walleij