[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b24198d-2e74-43b5-96be-bdf72274f712@rbox.co>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:29:44 +0200
From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Eugenio Pérez
<eperezma@...hat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] vsock/virtio: Reduce indentation in
virtio_transport_wait_close()
On 4/30/25 11:28, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:10:28AM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>> Flatten the function. Remove the nested block by inverting the condition:
>> return early on !timeout.
>
> IIUC we are removing this function in the next commit, so we can skip
> this patch IMO. I suggested this change, if we didn't move the code in
> the core.
Right, I remember your suggestion. Sorry, I'm still a bit uncertain as to
what should and shouldn't be done in a single commit.
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists