linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: timer: Add EcoNet EN751221 "HPT" CPU Timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47aae905-1a89-44aa-a31f-6cbfc0eb6726@cjdns.fr>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 01:28:42 +0200
From: Caleb James DeLisle <cjd@...ns.fr>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, robh@...nel.org,
 krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de,
 daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, benjamin.larsson@...exis.eu,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: timer: Add EcoNet EN751221 "HPT" CPU
 Timer


On 01/05/2025 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 01:34:27PM GMT, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
>> Add device tree bindings for the so-called high-precision timer (HPT)
>> in the EcoNet EN751221 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Caleb James DeLisle <cjd@...ns.fr>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/timer/econet,en751221-timer.yaml | 80 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/econet,en751221-timer.yaml
>>
> What changed? Nothing explains dropping the tag.


Sorry I lost track of it, I will re-send with it attached again.

Thanks,

Caleb


>
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
> patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
> bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
> on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
> need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
> will do that for tags received on the version they apply.
>
> Please read:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> </form letter>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>