[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wikfj_JLqDQCc+AsymUije3Sm8h30zQeT4yieqRicFOzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 16:37:54 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>,
Marcus Seyfarth <m.seyfarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] include/linux/typecheck.h: Zero initialize dummy variables
On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 16:28, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> How long has that been valid? Because this is certainly new to the
> kernel, and sparse does complain about this initializer.
Sparse is clearly wrong.
I went back to my old K&R book, and the "perhaps in braces" languager
is there in that original (ok, so I only have the "newer" ANSI version
of K&R, so I'm not checking the _original_ original).
I guess we might as well ignore the sparse problem, since sparse ends
up having issues with so many other newer things we're doing, and we
don't have anybody maintaining it.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists