linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: amd: ps: fix for irq handler return status

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <174607820124.4025361.17364354865281577854.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 14:43:21 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com, 
 Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@....com, venkataprasad.potturu@....com, 
 Mario.Limonciello@....com, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, 
 Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
 "open list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, 
 open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: amd: ps: fix for irq handler return status

On Thu, 01 May 2025 01:24:43 +0530, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
> If any Soundwire manager interrupt is reported, and wake interrupt
> is not reported, in this scenario irq_flag will be set to zero,
> which results in interrupt handler return status as IRQ_NONE.
> 
> Add new irq flag 'wake_irq_flag' check for SoundWire wake interrupt
> handling to fix incorrect irq handling return status.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: amd: ps: fix for irq handler return status
      commit: 7f91f012c1df07af6b915d1f8cece202774bb50e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark