[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025050148-expand-definite-8401@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 09:54:41 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ron Economos <re@...z.net>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/204] 6.6.89-rc1 review
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 05:27:31PM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
> On 4/30/25 10:59, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.89 release.
> > > There are 204 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Thu, 01 May 2025 16:10:15 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.89-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Following two build regressions found one on riscv and s390.
> >
> > 1)
> > Regressions on riscv build with allyesconfig and allmodconfig with toolchains
> > gcc-13 and clang-20 failed on stable-rc 6.6.89-rc1.
> >
> > * riscv, build
> > - clang-20-allmodconfig
> > - gcc-13-allmodconfig
> > - gcc-13-allyesconfig
> >
> > Regression Analysis:
> > - New regression? Yes
> > - Reproducibility? Yes
> >
> > Build regression: riscv uprobes.c error unused variable 'start'
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> >
> > ## Build error riscv
> > arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uprobe_copy_ixol':
> > arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c:170:23: error: unused variable
> > 'start' [-Werror=unused-variable]
> > 170 | unsigned long start = (unsigned long)dst;
> > | ^~~~~
> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> This warning is caused by not having the fixup patch "riscv: Replace
> function-like macro by static inline function" upstream commit
> 121f34341d396b666d8a90b24768b40e08ca0d61 in 6.6.89-rc1, 6.1.136-rc1 and
> 5.15.181-rc1. Looks like it didn't apply cleanly to those versions.
>
> The fixup patch was included in 6.14.5-rc1 and 6.12.26-rc1.
Thanks, I'll go drop this from 5.15.y, 6.1.y, and 6.6.y for now and wait
for some fixes to be resent.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists