[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=kHzATUO_H=cVsuak0dajPH05toyjW+TBMovKid57zCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 11:22:27 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Cc: rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
a.hindborg@...sung.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, frederic@...nel.org,
lyude@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, anna-maria@...utronix.de,
jstultz@...gle.com, sboyd@...nel.org, ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com,
gary@...yguo.net, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me,
aliceryhl@...gle.com, tmgross@...ch.edu, chrisi.schrefl@...il.com,
arnd@...db.de, linux@...linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] rust: time: Avoid 64-bit integer division
On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 3:58 AM FUJITA Tomonori
<fujita.tomonori@...il.com> wrote:
>
> +s64 rust_helper_ktime_to_us(const ktime_t kt)
> +{
> + return ktime_divns(kt, NSEC_PER_USEC);
> +}
> +
> +s64 rust_helper_ktime_to_ms(const ktime_t kt)
> +{
> + return ktime_divns(kt, NSEC_PER_MSEC);
> +}
In general, we want to keep helpers mapping to the functions as close
as possible to the C side (e.g. same arguments), unless there is a
good reason not to -- but since you are changing it, let's review
v2...
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists