linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: sunxi-ng: fix order of arguments in clock macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <174610166405.2974716.1586244113913047340.b4-ty@csie.org>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 20:14:24 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, 
 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, 
 Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, 
 Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
 linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: sunxi-ng: fix order of arguments in clock macro

On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:53:25 +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> When introducing the SUNXI_CCU_MP_DATA_WITH_MUX_GATE_FEAT macro, the order
> of the last two arguments was different between the users and the
> definition: features became flags and flags became features.
> 
> This just didn't end up in a desaster yet because most users ended up
> passing 0 for both arguments, and other clocks (for the new A523 SoC) are
> not yet used.
> 
> [...]

Applied to clk-fixes-for-6.15 in git@...hub.com:linux-sunxi/linux-sunxi.git, thanks!

[1/1] clk: sunxi-ng: fix order of arguments in clock macro
      commit: 4a9c3c3215491f25bc66d615faa921c814b1a479

Best regards,
-- 
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>