lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250501155603.GE4356@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 17:56:03 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com,
	wei.liu@...nel.org, decui@...rosoft.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
	hpa@...or.com, seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
	ardb@...nel.org, kees@...nel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, samitolvanen@...gle.com,
	ojeda@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/13] objtool: Validate kCFI calls

On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 09:03:29PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > > +	list_for_each_entry(insn, &file->retpoline_call_list, call_node) {
> > > +		struct symbol *sym = insn->sym;
> > > +
> > > +		if (sym && sym->type == STT_FUNC && !sym->nocfi) {
> > > +			struct instruction *prev =
> > > +				prev_insn_same_sym(file, insn);
> > > +
> > > +			if (!prev || prev->type != INSN_BUG) {
> > > +				WARN_INSN(insn, "no-cfi indirect call!");
> > > +				warnings++;
> > 
> > Do we not care about indirect calls from !STT_FUNC?

I extended to also cover STT_NOTYPE, no additional warns.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ