linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] PCI: endpoint: Use scoped_guard for manual mutex lock/unlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <88bf352aab2b3ba68b2381b23706513e4cdea155.1746114596.git.karanja99erick@gmail.com>
Date: Thu,  1 May 2025 18:56:12 +0300
From: Erick Karanja <karanja99erick@...il.com>
To: manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
	kw@...ux.com
Cc: kishon@...nel.org,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	julia.lawall@...ia.fr,
	Erick Karanja <karanja99erick@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: endpoint: Use scoped_guard for manual mutex lock/unlock

This refactor replaces manual mutex lock/unlock with scoped_guard()
in places where early exits use goto. Using scoped_guard()
avoids error-prone unlock paths and simplifies control flow.

Signed-off-by: Erick Karanja <karanja99erick@...il.com>
---
 drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 53 +++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
index beabea00af91..3f3ff36fa8ab 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
@@ -709,7 +709,6 @@ int pci_epc_add_epf(struct pci_epc *epc, struct pci_epf *epf,
 {
 	struct list_head *list;
 	u32 func_no;
-	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || epf->is_vf)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -720,36 +719,32 @@ int pci_epc_add_epf(struct pci_epc *epc, struct pci_epf *epf,
 	if (type == SECONDARY_INTERFACE && epf->sec_epc)
 		return -EBUSY;
 
-	mutex_lock(&epc->list_lock);
-	func_no = find_first_zero_bit(&epc->function_num_map,
-				      BITS_PER_LONG);
-	if (func_no >= BITS_PER_LONG) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto ret;
-	}
-
-	if (func_no > epc->max_functions - 1) {
-		dev_err(&epc->dev, "Exceeding max supported Function Number\n");
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto ret;
+	scoped_guard(mutex, &epc->list_lock) {
+		func_no = find_first_zero_bit(&epc->function_num_map,
+					      BITS_PER_LONG);
+		if (func_no >= BITS_PER_LONG)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		if (func_no > epc->max_functions - 1) {
+			dev_err(&epc->dev, "Exceeding max supported Function Number\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		set_bit(func_no, &epc->function_num_map);
+		if (type == PRIMARY_INTERFACE) {
+			epf->func_no = func_no;
+			epf->epc = epc;
+			list = &epf->list;
+		} else {
+			epf->sec_epc_func_no = func_no;
+			epf->sec_epc = epc;
+			list = &epf->sec_epc_list;
+		}
+
+		list_add_tail(list, &epc->pci_epf);
 	}
 
-	set_bit(func_no, &epc->function_num_map);
-	if (type == PRIMARY_INTERFACE) {
-		epf->func_no = func_no;
-		epf->epc = epc;
-		list = &epf->list;
-	} else {
-		epf->sec_epc_func_no = func_no;
-		epf->sec_epc = epc;
-		list = &epf->sec_epc_list;
-	}
-
-	list_add_tail(list, &epc->pci_epf);
-ret:
-	mutex_unlock(&epc->list_lock);
-
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_add_epf);
 
-- 
2.43.0