[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2caa472-01da-4dc2-8c38-bf0cd4524bcd@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 17:00:13 +0100
From: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Zenghui Yu
<yuzenghui@...wei.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@...amperecomputing.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>, Alper Gun
<alpergun@...gle.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 15/43] arm64: RME: Allow VMM to set RIPAS
On 30/04/2025 12:38, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On 4/16/25 11:41 PM, Steven Price wrote:
>> Each page within the protected region of the realm guest can be marked
>> as either RAM or EMPTY. Allow the VMM to control this before the guest
>> has started and provide the equivalent functions to change this (with
>> the guest's approval) at runtime.
>>
>> When transitioning from RIPAS RAM (1) to RIPAS EMPTY (0) the memory is
>> unmapped from the guest and undelegated allowing the memory to be reused
>> by the host. When transitioning to RIPAS RAM the actual population of
>> the leaf RTTs is done later on stage 2 fault, however it may be
>> necessary to allocate additional RTTs to allow the RMM track the RIPAS
>> for the requested range.
>>
>> When freeing a block mapping it is necessary to temporarily unfold the
>> RTT which requires delegating an extra page to the RMM, this page can
>> then be recovered once the contents of the block mapping have been
>> freed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
>> ---
>> Changes from v7:
>> * Replace use of "only_shared" with the upstream "attr_filter" field
>> of struct kvm_gfn_range.
>> * Clean up the logic in alloc_delegated_granule() for when to call
>> kvm_account_pgtable_pages().
>> * Rename realm_destroy_protected_granule() to
>> realm_destroy_private_granule() to match the naming elsewhere. Also
>> fix the return codes in the function to be descriptive.
>> * Several other minor changes to names/return codes.
>> Changes from v6:
>> * Split the code dealing with the guest triggering a RIPAS change into
>> a separate patch, so this patch is purely for the VMM setting up the
>> RIPAS before the guest first runs.
>> * Drop the useless flags argument from alloc_delegated_granule().
>> * Account RTTs allocated for a guest using kvm_account_pgtable_pages().
>> * Deal with the RMM granule size potentially being smaller than the
>> host's PAGE_SIZE. Although note alloc_delegated_granule() currently
>> still allocates an entire host page for every RMM granule (so wasting
>> memory when PAGE_SIZE>4k).
>> Changes from v5:
>> * Adapt to rebasing.
>> * Introduce find_map_level()
>> * Rename some functions to be clearer.
>> * Drop the "spare page" functionality.
>> Changes from v2:
>> * {alloc,free}_delegated_page() moved from previous patch to this one.
>> * alloc_delegated_page() now takes a gfp_t flags parameter.
>> * Fix the reference counting of guestmem pages to avoid leaking memory.
>> * Several misc code improvements and extra comments.
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h | 5 +
>> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 8 +-
>> arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c | 384 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 394 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h b/arch/arm64/include/
>> asm/kvm_rme.h
>> index 9bcad6ec5dbb..b916db8565a2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
>> @@ -101,6 +101,11 @@ void kvm_realm_destroy_rtts(struct kvm *kvm, u32
>> ia_bits);
>> int kvm_create_rec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> void kvm_destroy_rec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> +void kvm_realm_unmap_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>> + unsigned long ipa,
>> + unsigned long size,
>> + bool unmap_private);
>> +
>> static inline bool kvm_realm_is_private_address(struct realm *realm,
>> unsigned long addr)
>> {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> index d80a9d408f71..71c04259e39f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ static void invalidate_icache_guest_page(void *va,
>> size_t size)
>> * @start: The intermediate physical base address of the range to unmap
>> * @size: The size of the area to unmap
>> * @may_block: Whether or not we are permitted to block
>> + * @only_shared: If true then protected mappings should not be unmapped
>> *
>> * Clear a range of stage-2 mappings, lowering the various ref-
>> counts. Must
>> * be called while holding mmu_lock (unless for freeing the stage2
>> pgd before
>> @@ -330,7 +331,7 @@ static void invalidate_icache_guest_page(void *va,
>> size_t size)
>> * with things behind our backs.
>> */
>> static void __unmap_stage2_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t
>> start, u64 size,
>> - bool may_block)
>> + bool may_block, bool only_shared)
>> {
>> struct kvm *kvm = kvm_s2_mmu_to_kvm(mmu);
>> phys_addr_t end = start + size;
>> @@ -344,7 +345,7 @@ static void __unmap_stage2_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu
>> *mmu, phys_addr_t start, u64
>> void kvm_stage2_unmap_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t start,
>> u64 size, bool may_block)
>> {
>> - __unmap_stage2_range(mmu, start, size, may_block);
>> + __unmap_stage2_range(mmu, start, size, may_block, false);
>> }
>> void kvm_stage2_flush_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t
>> addr, phys_addr_t end)
>> @@ -1975,7 +1976,8 @@ bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct
>> kvm_gfn_range *range)
>> __unmap_stage2_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, range->start << PAGE_SHIFT,
>> (range->end - range->start) << PAGE_SHIFT,
>> - range->may_block);
>> + range->may_block,
>> + !(range->attr_filter & KVM_FILTER_PRIVATE));
>> kvm_nested_s2_unmap(kvm, range->may_block);
>> return false;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
>> index 1239eb07aca6..33eb793d8bdb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
>> @@ -87,6 +87,51 @@ static int get_start_level(struct realm *realm)
>> return 4 - ((realm->ia_bits - 8) / (RMM_PAGE_SHIFT - 3));
>> }
>> +static int find_map_level(struct realm *realm,
>> + unsigned long start,
>> + unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> + int level = RMM_RTT_MAX_LEVEL;
>> +
>> + while (level > get_start_level(realm)) {
>> + unsigned long map_size = rme_rtt_level_mapsize(level - 1);
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(start, map_size) ||
>> + (start + map_size) > end)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + level--;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return level;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static phys_addr_t alloc_delegated_granule(struct
>> kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc)
>> +{
>> + phys_addr_t phys;
>> + void *virt;
>> +
>> + if (mc)
>> + virt = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(mc);
>> + else
>> + virt = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>
>
> It would be more safe to use (GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_ACCOUNT),
> consistent
> to the flags used by kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc().
Ack
>> +
>> + if (!virt)
>> + return PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
>> +
>> + phys = virt_to_phys(virt);
>> +
>> + if (rmi_granule_delegate(phys)) {
>> + free_page((unsigned long)virt);
>> +
>> + return PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
>> + }
>> +
>> + kvm_account_pgtable_pages(virt, 1);
>> +
>> + return phys;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void free_delegated_granule(phys_addr_t phys)
>> {
>> if (WARN_ON(rmi_granule_undelegate(phys))) {
>> @@ -99,6 +144,154 @@ static void free_delegated_granule(phys_addr_t phys)
>> free_page((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(phys));
>> }
>> +static int realm_rtt_create(struct realm *realm,
>> + unsigned long addr,
>> + int level,
>> + phys_addr_t phys)
>> +{
>> + addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, rme_rtt_level_mapsize(level - 1));
>> + return rmi_rtt_create(virt_to_phys(realm->rd), phys, addr, level);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int realm_rtt_fold(struct realm *realm,
>> + unsigned long addr,
>> + int level,
>> + phys_addr_t *rtt_granule)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long out_rtt;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = rmi_rtt_fold(virt_to_phys(realm->rd), addr, level, &out_rtt);
>> +
>> + if (RMI_RETURN_STATUS(ret) == RMI_SUCCESS && rtt_granule)
>> + *rtt_granule = out_rtt;
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int realm_destroy_private_granule(struct realm *realm,
>> + unsigned long ipa,
>> + unsigned long *next_addr,
>> + phys_addr_t *out_rtt)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long rd = virt_to_phys(realm->rd);
>> + unsigned long rtt_addr;
>> + phys_addr_t rtt;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> +retry:
>> + ret = rmi_data_destroy(rd, ipa, &rtt_addr, next_addr);
>> + if (RMI_RETURN_STATUS(ret) == RMI_ERROR_RTT) {
>> + if (*next_addr > ipa)
>> + return 0; /* UNASSIGNED */
>> + rtt = alloc_delegated_granule(NULL);
>> + if (WARN_ON(rtt == PHYS_ADDR_MAX))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + /*
>> + * ASSIGNED - ipa is mapped as a block, so split. The index
>> + * from the return code should be 2 otherwise it appears
>> + * there's a huge page bigger than KVM currently supports
>> + */
>> + WARN_ON(RMI_RETURN_INDEX(ret) != 2);
>> + ret = realm_rtt_create(realm, ipa, 3, rtt);
>> + if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
>> + free_delegated_granule(rtt);
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + }
>> + goto retry;
>> + } else if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = rmi_granule_undelegate(rtt_addr);
>> + if (WARN_ON(ret))
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> +
>> + *out_rtt = rtt_addr;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int realm_unmap_private_page(struct realm *realm,
>> + unsigned long ipa,
>> + unsigned long *next_addr)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long end = ALIGN(ipa + 1, PAGE_SIZE);
>> + unsigned long addr;
>> + phys_addr_t out_rtt = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + for (addr = ipa; addr < end; addr = *next_addr) {
>> + ret = realm_destroy_private_granule(realm, addr, next_addr,
>> + &out_rtt);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (out_rtt != PHYS_ADDR_MAX)
>> + free_page((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(out_rtt));
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void realm_unmap_shared_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>> + int level,
>> + unsigned long start,
>> + unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> + struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
>> + unsigned long rd = virt_to_phys(realm->rd);
>> + ssize_t map_size = rme_rtt_level_mapsize(level);
>> + unsigned long next_addr, addr;
>> + unsigned long shared_bit = BIT(realm->ia_bits - 1);
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(level > RMM_RTT_MAX_LEVEL))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + start |= shared_bit;
>> + end |= shared_bit;
>> +
>> + for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next_addr) {
>> + unsigned long align_addr = ALIGN(addr, map_size);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + next_addr = ALIGN(addr + 1, map_size);
>> +
>> + if (align_addr != addr || next_addr > end) {
>> + /* Need to recurse deeper */
>> + if (addr < align_addr)
>> + next_addr = align_addr;
>> + realm_unmap_shared_range(kvm, level + 1, addr,
>> + min(next_addr, end));
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = rmi_rtt_unmap_unprotected(rd, addr, level, &next_addr);
>> + switch (RMI_RETURN_STATUS(ret)) {
>> + case RMI_SUCCESS:
>> + break;
>> + case RMI_ERROR_RTT:
>> + if (next_addr == addr) {
>> + /*
>> + * There's a mapping here, but it's not a block
>> + * mapping, so reset next_addr to the next block
>> + * boundary and recurse to clear out the pages
>> + * one level deeper.
>> + */
>> + next_addr = ALIGN(addr + 1, map_size);
>> + realm_unmap_shared_range(kvm, level + 1, addr,
>> + next_addr);
>> + }
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + WARN_ON(1);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + cond_resched_rwlock_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Calculate the number of s2 root rtts needed */
>> static int realm_num_root_rtts(struct realm *realm)
>> {
>> @@ -209,6 +402,40 @@ static int realm_rtt_destroy(struct realm *realm,
>> unsigned long addr,
>> return ret;
>> }
>> +static int realm_create_rtt_levels(struct realm *realm,
>> + unsigned long ipa,
>> + int level,
>> + int max_level,
>> + struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc)
>> +{
>> + if (level == max_level)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + while (level++ < max_level) {
>> + phys_addr_t rtt = alloc_delegated_granule(mc);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (rtt == PHYS_ADDR_MAX)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + ret = realm_rtt_create(realm, ipa, level, rtt);
>> +
>> + if (RMI_RETURN_STATUS(ret) == RMI_ERROR_RTT &&
>> + RMI_RETURN_INDEX(ret) == level) {
>> + /* The RTT already exists, continue */
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + if (ret) {
>> + WARN(1, "Failed to create RTT at level %d: %d\n",
>> + level, ret);
>> + free_delegated_granule(rtt);
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int realm_tear_down_rtt_level(struct realm *realm, int level,
>> unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>> {
>> @@ -299,6 +526,61 @@ static int realm_tear_down_rtt_range(struct realm
>> *realm,
>> start, end);
>> }
>> +/*
>> + * Returns 0 on successful fold, a negative value on error, a
>> positive value if
>> + * we were not able to fold all tables at this level.
>> + */
>> +static int realm_fold_rtt_level(struct realm *realm, int level,
>> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> + int not_folded = 0;
>> + ssize_t map_size;
>> + unsigned long addr, next_addr;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(level > RMM_RTT_MAX_LEVEL))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + map_size = rme_rtt_level_mapsize(level - 1);
>> +
>> + for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next_addr) {
>> + phys_addr_t rtt_granule;
>> + int ret;
>> + unsigned long align_addr = ALIGN(addr, map_size);
>> +
>> + next_addr = ALIGN(addr + 1, map_size);
>> +
>> + ret = realm_rtt_fold(realm, align_addr, level, &rtt_granule);
>> +
>> + switch (RMI_RETURN_STATUS(ret)) {
>> + case RMI_SUCCESS:
>> + free_delegated_granule(rtt_granule);
>> + break;
>> + case RMI_ERROR_RTT:
>> + if (level == RMM_RTT_MAX_LEVEL ||
>> + RMI_RETURN_INDEX(ret) < level) {
>> + not_folded++;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + /* Recurse a level deeper */
>> + ret = realm_fold_rtt_level(realm,
>> + level + 1,
>> + addr,
>> + next_addr);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> + else if (ret == 0)
>> + /* Try again at this level */
>> + next_addr = addr;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + WARN_ON(1);
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return not_folded;
>> +}
>> +
>> void kvm_realm_destroy_rtts(struct kvm *kvm, u32 ia_bits)
>> {
>> struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
>> @@ -306,6 +588,96 @@ void kvm_realm_destroy_rtts(struct kvm *kvm, u32
>> ia_bits)
>> WARN_ON(realm_tear_down_rtt_range(realm, 0, (1UL << ia_bits)));
>> }
>> +static void realm_unmap_private_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>> + unsigned long start,
>> + unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> + struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
>> + unsigned long next_addr, addr;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next_addr) {
>> + ret = realm_unmap_private_page(realm, addr, &next_addr);
>> +
>> + if (ret)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + realm_fold_rtt_level(realm, get_start_level(realm) + 1,
>> + start, end);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void kvm_realm_unmap_range(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
>> + unsigned long size, bool unmap_private)
>> +{
>
> This function can be called by the MMU notifier to invalidate the
> mapping for
> the specified IPA range. However, we're missing one parameter to
> indicate if
> the request from the MMU notifier is blockable or not. We're having the
> imprecise
> assumption that all requests are blockable, which isn't always true.
> With this
> assumption, cond_resched_rwlock_write(&kvm->mmu_lock) is always called in
> realm_unmap_shared_range().
>
> Another issue is that cond_resched_rwlock_write(&kvm->mmu_lock) is
> missed if
> the request is blockable in realm_unmap_private_page().
Thanks, that makes a lot of sense. I'd got myself rather confused about
whether this function could block or not. Somehow I'd completely missed
the may_block flag in __unmap_stage2_range().
>> + unsigned long end = start + size;
>> + struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
>> +
>> + end = min(BIT(realm->ia_bits - 1), end);
>> +
>> + if (realm->state == REALM_STATE_NONE)
>> + return;
>
> if (!kvm_realm_is_created(kvm)))
> return;
Ack
>> +
>> + realm_unmap_shared_range(kvm, find_map_level(realm, start, end),
>> + start, end);
>> + if (unmap_private)
>> + realm_unmap_private_range(kvm, start, end);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int realm_init_ipa_state(struct realm *realm,
>> + unsigned long ipa,
>> + unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> + phys_addr_t rd_phys = virt_to_phys(realm->rd);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + while (ipa < end) {
>> + unsigned long next;
>> +
>> + ret = rmi_rtt_init_ripas(rd_phys, ipa, end, &next);
>> +
>> + if (RMI_RETURN_STATUS(ret) == RMI_ERROR_RTT) {
>> + int err_level = RMI_RETURN_INDEX(ret);
>> + int level = find_map_level(realm, ipa, end);
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(err_level >= level))
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> +
>> + ret = realm_create_rtt_levels(realm, ipa,
>> + err_level,
>> + level, NULL);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + /* Retry with the RTT levels in place */
>> + continue;
>> + } else if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ipa = next;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>
> The readability would be better if the explicit 'continue' can be avoid,
> something
> like below:
>
> switch (RMI_RETURN_STATUS(ret)) {
> case RMI_SUCCESS:
> ipa = next;
> break;
> case RMI_ERROR_RTT:
> :
> ret = realm_create_rtt_levels(realm, ipa, error_level, level,
> NULL);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> break;
> default:
> WARN_ON(1);
> return -ENXIO;
> }
I have to admit to quite liking 'continue' for retry loops, but in this
case your switch statement seems just as readable so I'll switch this.
>> +static int kvm_init_ipa_range_realm(struct kvm *kvm,
>> + struct arm_rme_init_ripas *args)
>> +{
>> + gpa_t addr, end;
>> + struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
>> +
>> + addr = args->base;
>> + end = addr + args->size;
>> +
>> + if (end < addr)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> The check needs to cover 'end <= addr'. RMI_ERROR_INPUT is returned from
> RMM::smc_rtt_init_ripas()
> if 'end' is equal to 'addr', but we're returning 0, inconsistent to that.
I agree we're different to smc_rtt_init_ripas(), but I don't really see
why we should prevent args->size==0. Calling the low level SMC in that
case would clearly be wrong (the kernel should be validating and that
would show a lack of validation), but we handle that with the while loop
in realm_init_ipa_state().
Do you think it's important to define this uAPI to disallow size==0?
> if (end <= addr)
> return -EINVAL;
>
>> +
>> + if (kvm_realm_state(kvm) != REALM_STATE_NEW)
>> + return -EPERM;
>
> To keep the consistency, kvm_realm_is_created() can be used here.
>
> if (kvm_realm_is_created(kvm))
> return -EPERM;
This isn't the same - kvm_realm_is_create() is checking for
REALM_STATE_NONE, but we want to check for REALM_STATE_NEW.
Thanks,
Steve
>> +
>> + return realm_init_ipa_state(realm, addr, end);
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Protects access to rme_vmid_bitmap */
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(rme_vmid_lock);
>> static unsigned long *rme_vmid_bitmap;
>> @@ -431,6 +803,18 @@ int kvm_realm_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm, struct
>> kvm_enable_cap *cap)
>> case KVM_CAP_ARM_RME_CREATE_REALM:
>> r = kvm_create_realm(kvm);
>> break;
>> + case KVM_CAP_ARM_RME_INIT_RIPAS_REALM: {
>> + struct arm_rme_init_ripas args;
>> + void __user *argp = u64_to_user_ptr(cap->args[1]);
>> +
>> + if (copy_from_user(&args, argp, sizeof(args))) {
>> + r = -EFAULT;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + r = kvm_init_ipa_range_realm(kvm, &args);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> default:
>> r = -EINVAL;
>> break;
>
> Thanks,
> Gavin
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists