linux-kernel - Re: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] erroneous buffer overflow detected in bch2_xattr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D9967EB7-7F4D-4122-9470-DB14700FD906@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 01:28:28 +0800
From: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@...il.com>
To: Jan Hendrik Farr <kernel@...rr.cc>
Cc: kent.overstreet@...ux.dev,
 Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>,
 Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
 Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
 Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
 regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 ardb@...nel.org,
 ojeda@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] erroneous buffer overflow detected in
 bch2_xattr_validate


Thanks,
Alan



> On May 2, 2025, at 01:22, Jan Hendrik Farr <kernel@...rr.cc> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I wonder if the __counted_by(x_name_len) in struct bch_xattr is needed, since there is also a value after x_name.
> 
> Wait a minute. Are you saying that the value with length x_val_len
> is behind the name (of length x_name_len) at the end of the struct.
> So essentially the flexible array member x_name has a length of
> x_name_len + x_val_len and contains both the name and value?

Yes.

> 
> If that's the case:
> 
> 1. that's not at all clear from the struct definition
> 2. __counted_by(x_name_len) is not correct in that case
> 

Both clang and gcc say:

    • p->array has at least p->count number of elements available all the time. 

Note the at least here. Though I think the counted_by is misleading here.

> 
> Best Regards
> Jan