[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72m8VWKRyFai0Xg8AZUTjG0eUVG8nY-ZCQOqOnvwsW0ZaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 23:46:44 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Fiona Behrens <me@...enk.dev>,
Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@...teo.net>, Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] rust: configfs: introduce rust support for configfs
On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 11:28 PM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Ah -- that explains it. Yeah, your calls to `add` were from const
> contexts, which explains what you were trying to say.
No, wait, they are not from const context. So a "normal" `assert!`
there would have never worked.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists