linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 00/27] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to /fs/resctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f8bf0815-4013-4485-9ed0-a5b5ffab9f26@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 09:30:07 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: <babu.moger@....com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, D Scott Phillips OS
	<scott@...amperecomputing.com>, <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
	<lcherian@...vell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>,
	<tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>, <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Jamie Iles
	<quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	<peternewman@...gle.com>, <dfustini@...libre.com>, <amitsinght@...vell.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>,
	"Dave Martin" <dave.martin@....com>, Koba Ko <kobak@...dia.com>, Shanker
 Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>, <fenghuay@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/27] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to
 /fs/resctrl

Hi Babu,

On 5/2/25 9:04 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
> 
> I retested the patches on a couple of AMD systems, and everything looks good.
> 
> Tested-by: Babu Moger babu.moger@....com

Thank you very much.

> 
> It's very likely that these patches will be merged before my ABMC series [1].
> 
> I'm currently working on v13 of the ABMC series and considering rebasing
> it on top of James' v9. That could potentially eliminate one review cycle
> during the merge process.
> 
> What are your thoughts on this approach?

Thanks for considering this. From my viewpoint this sounds like a good plan.
I do not have insight into James's schedule to support this but from what I
can tell this work is close to being ready for inclusion.

Reinette

> 
> 1. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1743725907.git.babu.moger@amd.com/