linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Introduce PRU UART driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a7141387-1b3c-422a-963e-d94fe8eaacf3@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 17:07:53 -0500
From: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kevin Hilman
	<khilman@...libre.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, Hari Nagalla
	<hnagalla@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Introduce PRU UART driver

Hi Andy,

On 5/2/25 4:51 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 09:47:34AM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> On 5/1/25 12:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 07:31:11PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote:
>>>> This patch series is sent as an RFC to get some initial comments
>>>> on the PRU UART driver.
>>>>
>>>> The ICSSM modules on am64x SoC and the PRUSS module on am62 SoC or am335x
>>>> SoCs have a UART sub-module. This patch series introduces the driver and the
>>>> corresponding binding documentation for this sub-module.
>>>>
>>>> The DTS patches for adding PRU nodes and enabling PRU UART will be added
>>>> in a later v1 version of the series if accepted.
>>>>
>>>> This driver has been previously tested on the following boards:
>>>> am64x SK, am62x SK, and am335x SK boards.
>>>
>>> Why is this "RFC"?  What needs to be done to make it something that you
>>> actually feel works properly and should be merged?
>>
>> Nothing needs to be done IMO, the only reason it was sent as an RFC is
>> to get initial thoughts/issues that anyone might have with the driver
>> before sending v1.
>>
>> If none, I will go ahead and send v1. Thanks for your attention Greg.
> 
> I have tons of comments, please read my replies before sending a v1.

Thanks for your comments, I need a day or so to review and then respond
to your comments and Andrews.

Judith

>