[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250502065841.GB8309@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 08:58:41 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, brauner@...nel.org, hch@....de,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, cem@...nel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, dchinner@...hat.com,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@...il.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, catherine.hoang@...cle.com,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/15] xfs: move buftarg atomic write geometry config
to setsize_buftarg
On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 12:53:05PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> hch: is this better? patch 16 can move up, and this can be folded into
> patch 5
Much better. Although I'd also rename xfs_setsize_buftarg to
xfs_configure_buftarg and xfs_buftarg_config_atomic_writes to
xfs_buftarg_configure_atomic_writes for consistency.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists