[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250502074529.ri73hs6xyztn4k4y@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 13:15:29 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Praveen Talari <quic_ptalari@...cinc.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, psodagud@...cinc.com, djaggi@...cinc.com,
quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com, quic_vtanuku@...cinc.com,
quic_arandive@...cinc.com, quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com,
quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] opp: add new helper API dev_pm_opp_set_level()
On 02-05-25, 13:07, Praveen Talari wrote:
> How come? i have synced linux-next today itself and pushed from it, even i
> didn't face any issue.
Yeah, you won't face any issues, but scope-based cleanup helpers were
added recently and should have been used here, though it wasn't
obvious, so its fine.
> Let me know how/where rebased i.e linux-next or linux?
linux-next should be fine normally.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists