lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <398dd7f9-7651-4b36-a543-093a219c0077@163.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 16:40:55 +0800
From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/msi: Fix MSI domain debugfs show



On 2025/5/2 15:33, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 09:51:07AM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2025/4/30 20:48, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>> irq_domain_debug_show_one() calls the irqdomain's debug_show() with
>>> a non-null domain pointer and a null irqdata pointer
>>> (irq_debug_show_data() calls debug_show() with those the other way
>>> around). Ensure we have a non-null irqdata pointer in
>>> msi_domain_debug_show() before dereferencing it.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 01499ae673dc ("genirq/msi: Expose MSI message data in debugfs")
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
>>> ---
>>>    kernel/irq/msi.c | 2 +-
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
>>> index 5c8d43cdb0a3..c05ba7ca00fa 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
>>> @@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ static int msi_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *domain, struct irq_fwspec *fw
>>>    static void msi_domain_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, struct irq_domain *d,
>>>    				  struct irq_data *irqd, int ind)
>>>    {
>>> -	struct msi_desc *desc = irq_data_get_msi_desc(irqd);
>>> +	struct msi_desc *desc = irqd ? irq_data_get_msi_desc(irqd) : NULL;
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> I think irqd will never be NULL.
>>
>>
>> static int irq_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
>>    irq_debug_show_data(m, data, 0);
>>      if (data->domain && data->domain->ops && data->domain->ops->debug_show)
>>        data->domain->ops->debug_show(m, NULL, data, ind + 1);
>>          msi_domain_debug_show
>>
>>
>>
>> static int irq_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
>> {
>> 	struct irq_desc *desc = m->private;
>> 	struct irq_data *data;
>>
>> 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
>> 	data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
>>
>> 	If it needs to be judged as NULL, should it also be here?
>>
>>
>>
>> static void irq_domain_debug_show_one(struct seq_file *m, struct irq_domain
>> *d, int ind)
>>    if (d->ops && d->ops->debug_show)	// d->ops->debug_show is NULL, not
>> irq_debug_show.
>>
>>
>> If I'm wrong, please correct me.
>>
> 
> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/irq/domains/PCI-MSIX-0000:00:01.0-12
> [   51.954695] Unable to handle kernel access to user memory without uaccess routines at virtual address 0000000000000010
> [   51.956868] Current cat pgtable: 4K pagesize, 57-bit VAs, pgdp=0x0000000101a9a000
> [   51.957207] [0000000000000010] pgd=00000000407e8801, p4d=00000000406a9001, pud=00000000407ac001, pmd=00000000407ad001, pte=0000000000000000
> [   51.958324] Oops [#1]
> [   51.958417] Modules linked in:
> [   51.958721] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 83 Comm: cat Not tainted 6.15.0-rc4-00147-gebd297a2affa #1 NONE
> [   51.958993] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> [   51.959196] epc : msi_domain_debug_show+0xa/0x8a
> [   51.959736]  ra : irq_domain_debug_show_one+0xb6/0xf4
> [   51.959871] epc : ffffffff800a26a4 ra : ffffffff8009f064 sp : ff2000000035bc10
> [   51.960035]  gp : ffffffff81516710 tp : ff600000802d7080 t0 : ff600000809f20c3
> [   51.960204]  t1 : 00000000000000de t2 : ffffffff80e01470 s0 : ff2000000035bc40
> [   51.960373]  s1 : ff60000080285f00 a0 : ff60000081eb5000 a1 : ff60000080285f00
> [   51.960533]  a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000001 a4 : 0000000000000000
> [   51.960697]  a5 : ffffffff800a269a a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 : 0000000000000010
> [   51.960854]  s2 : ff60000081eb5000 s3 : 0000000000000000 s4 : 0000000000000001
> [   51.961017]  s5 : ff2000000035bd00 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 : ff60000081eb5028
> [   51.961188]  s8 : fffffffffffff000 s9 : ff60000081eb5038 s10: 000000007ffff000
> [   51.961349]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : ffffffff80e5d850 t4 : 0000000000174000
> [   51.961509]  t5 : 0000000000000002 t6 : ff600000809f20de
> [   51.961635] status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: 0000000000000010 cause: 000000000000000d
> [   51.961886] [<ffffffff800a26a4>] msi_domain_debug_show+0xa/0x8a
> [   51.962098] [<ffffffff8009f064>] irq_domain_debug_show_one+0xb6/0xf4
> [   51.962250] [<ffffffff8009f0b4>] irq_domain_debug_show+0x12/0x2a
> [   51.962389] [<ffffffff80246bd6>] seq_read_iter+0xc6/0x316
> [   51.962516] [<ffffffff80246f12>] seq_read+0xec/0x11e
> [   51.962634] [<ffffffff80381d20>] full_proxy_read+0x48/0x88
> [   51.962771] [<ffffffff802184de>] vfs_read+0xb2/0x288
> [   51.962897] [<ffffffff80218ecc>] ksys_read+0x56/0xc0
> [   51.963012] [<ffffffff80218f4a>] __riscv_sys_read+0x14/0x1c
> [   51.963147] [<ffffffff809f3566>] do_trap_ecall_u+0x186/0x206
> [   51.963290] [<ffffffff809fdf42>] handle_exception+0x146/0x152
> [   51.963588] Code: 0209 9181 b7a5 4981 b759 7179 f022 f406 e44e 1800 (6a1c) b983
> [   51.963910] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> Segmentation fault


Ok, I see. Thank you for fixing this problem.

Reviewed-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>

Best regards,
Hans



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ