[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250502084844.GT4198@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 10:48:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Prundeanu, Cristian" <cpru@...zon.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
"Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem" <abuehaze@...zon.com>,
"Saidi, Ali" <alisaidi@...zon.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"Blake, Geoff" <blakgeof@...zon.com>,
"Csoma, Csaba" <csabac@...zon.com>,
"Doebel, Bjoern" <doebel@...zon.de>,
Gautham Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@....com>,
Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...cle.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: EEVDF regression still exists
On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 04:16:07PM +0000, Prundeanu, Cristian wrote:
> (Please keep in mind that the target isn't to get SCHED_BATCH to the same
> level as 6.5-default; it's to resolve the regression from 6.5-default to
> 6.6+ default, and from 6.5-SCHED_BATCH to 6.6+ SCHED_BATCH).
No, the target definitely is not to make 6.6+ default match 6.5 default.
The target very much is getting you performance similar to the 6.5
default that you were happy with with knobs we can live with.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists