[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250502013010.GA3405545-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 20:30:10 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...rry.de>
Cc: Chaoyi Chen <kernel@...kyi.com>, FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki@...xa.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>,
Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
Jianfeng Liu <liujianfeng1994@...il.com>,
Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>,
Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen@...k-chips.com>,
Jimmy Hon <honyuenkwun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add rk3399 industry
evaluation board
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 04:48:35PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 4/30/25 4:36 PM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 15:48:47 +0800, Chaoyi Chen wrote:
> > > From: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen@...k-chips.com>
> > >
> > > Add devicetree binding for the rk3399 industry evaluation board.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen@...k-chips.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > (no changes since v1)
> > >
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 5 +++++
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > >
> >
> >
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> >
> > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> >
> > Missing tags:
> >
> > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> >
>
> To be fair, the Acked-by was given on the v1[1] after the v2[2] was sent, we
> cannot expect Chaoyi Chen to travel back in time :)
Usually a sign of sending new versions too quickly...
But I just send this semi-automated email so we capture the ack and I
can clear it out of my inbox.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists