linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] counter: interrupt-cnt: Protect enable/disable OPs with mutex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aBS1Mbta2iAV4EX-@ishi>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 21:06:09 +0900
From: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@...nel.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "Sverdlin, Alexander" <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>,
	"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] counter: interrupt-cnt: Protect enable/disable OPs with
 mutex

On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 01:50:24PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 08:43:18PM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 09:24:20AM +0000, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote:
> > > I've noticed that the patch has been marked as "Changes Requested" in
> > > the patchwork, could it be a mistake? Because I never received any
> > > change request.
> >
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > I can't comment on the patchwork status because I don't use that
> > service, but I apologize nonetheless for the delay in responding to your
> > patch submission. I'm hoping for an Ack from Oleksij, but this is a
> > pretty straight-forward fix that I'll be happy to pick it up regardless.
> >
> > Would you provide a Fixes line so the stable trees can pick this up for
> > the necessary kernel versions?
> 
> Sorry for delay, you can add my
> Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>

Thanks Oleksij!

Would you provide an Ack as well for Alexander's other interrupt-cnt
patch involving a change from atomic_t to atomic_long_t? [^1]

William Breathitt Gray

[^1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20250331152222.2263776-1-alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com/

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)