linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] rust: alloc: add Vec::push_within

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025050215-affluent-repair-3bb2@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 16:07:33 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com>,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] rust: alloc: add Vec::push_within_capacity

On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 01:19:31PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> This introduces a new method called `push_within_capacity` for appending
> to a vector without attempting to allocate if the capacity is full. Rust
> Binder will use this in various places to safely push to a vector while
> holding a spinlock.
> 
> The implementation is moved to a push_within_capacity_unchecked method.
> This is preferred over having push() call push_within_capacity()
> followed by an unwrap_unchecked() for simpler unsafe.
> 
> Panics in the kernel are best avoided when possible, so an error is
> returned if the vector does not have sufficient capacity. An error type
> is used rather than just returning Result<(),T> to make it more
> convenient for callers (i.e. they can use ? or unwrap).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> ---
>  rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs        | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  rust/kernel/alloc/kvec/errors.rs | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs b/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs
> index ebca0cfd31c67f3ce13c4825d7039e34bb54f4d4..e9bf4c97a5a78fc9b54751b57f15a33c716c607b 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs
> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
>      slice::SliceIndex,
>  };
>  
> +mod errors;
> +pub use self::errors::PushError;
> +
>  /// Create a [`KVec`] containing the arguments.
>  ///
>  /// New memory is allocated with `GFP_KERNEL`.
> @@ -307,17 +310,52 @@ pub fn spare_capacity_mut(&mut self) -> &mut [MaybeUninit<T>] {
>      /// ```
>      pub fn push(&mut self, v: T, flags: Flags) -> Result<(), AllocError> {
>          self.reserve(1, flags)?;
> +        // SAFETY: The call to `reserve` was successful, so the capacity is at least one greater
> +        // than the length.
> +        unsafe { self.push_within_capacity_unchecked(v) };
> +        Ok(())
> +    }
>  
> +    /// Appends an element to the back of the [`Vec`] instance without reallocating.
> +    ///
> +    /// Fails if the vector does not have capacity for the new element.
> +    ///
> +    /// # Examples
> +    ///
> +    /// ```
> +    /// let mut v = KVec::with_capacity(10, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> +    /// for i in 0..10 {
> +    ///     v.push_within_capacity(i)?;
> +    /// }
> +    ///
> +    /// assert!(v.push_within_capacity(10).is_err());
> +    /// # Ok::<(), Error>(())
> +    /// ```
> +    pub fn push_within_capacity(&mut self, v: T) -> Result<(), PushError<T>> {
> +        if self.len() < self.capacity() {
> +            // SAFETY: The length is less than the capacity.
> +            unsafe { self.push_within_capacity_unchecked(v) };
> +            Ok(())
> +        } else {
> +            Err(PushError(v))
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    /// Appends an element to the back of the [`Vec`] instance without reallocating.
> +    ///
> +    /// # Safety
> +    ///
> +    /// The length must be less than the capacity.
> +    pub unsafe fn push_within_capacity_unchecked(&mut self, v: T) {

Why does this have to be public?  Does binder need to call this instead
of just push_within_capacity()?

thanks,

greg k-h