linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] media: v4l2-core: Replace the check for firmware registered I2C devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aBTTOLmILq7D-AZy@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 17:14:16 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] media: v4l2-core: Replace the check for firmware
 registered I2C devices

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 03:17:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 07:16:17PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 01:30:34PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Replace the check for firmware registered I²C devices as the firmware node
> > > independently on type should be retrieved via dev_fwnode().
> > 
> > Hans, are you okay with this now? Can it be applied?
> 
> Is this fell into cracks? Also, can somebody harvest those pretty much simple
> one- or so liners that I have sent last week(s)? They all basically in a way
> about fwnode.

Any comments? Can it be applied?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko