[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBTT1JIz17g_2pM7@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 15:16:52 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Ignacio.MorenoGonzalez@...a.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: mmap: map MAP_STACK to VM_NOHUGEPAGE only if THP is
enabled
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 02:12:16PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 02:03:48PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 11:31:41AM +0200, Ignacio Moreno Gonzalez via B4 Relay wrote:
> > > From: Ignacio Moreno Gonzalez <Ignacio.MorenoGonzalez@...a.com>
> > >
> > > commit c4608d1bf7c6 ("mm: mmap: map MAP_STACK to VM_NOHUGEPAGE") maps
> > > the mmap option MAP_STACK to VM_NOHUGEPAGE. This is also done if
> > > CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGETABLES is not defined. But in that case, the
> > > VM_NOHUGEPAGE does not make sense. For instance, when calling madvise()
> > > with MADV_NOHUGEPAGE, an error is always returned.
> >
> > Isn't that the real problem though?
>
> Hmm, but wouldn't we want users who are trying to set MADV_[NO]HUGEPAGE to
> be made aware that it isn't going to do anything?
... I thought the patch was clear. Only setting NOHUGEPAGE becomes a
no-op. Setting HUGEPAGE remains EINVAL.
> And wouldn't changing this be a possibly 'breaking userspace' thing if
> somebody somewhere relies on this?
I don't see what userspace could rely on it returning EINVAL, since it
won't on a kernel which has THP enabled.
> Also this will make this inconsistent with e.g. MADV_COLLAPSE also?
Not sure how ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists