linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/12] tracing: branch: Use trace_tracing_is_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202505031738.buFg2SBt-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 18:10:14 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] tracing: branch: Use trace_tracing_is_on_cpu()
 instead of "disabled" field

Hi Steven,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on trace/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.15-rc4 next-20250502]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Steven-Rostedt/tracing-mmiotrace-Remove-reference-to-unused-per-CPU-data-pointer/20250503-050317
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250502205349.299144667%40goodmis.org
patch subject: [PATCH 09/12] tracing: branch: Use trace_tracing_is_on_cpu() instead of "disabled" field
config: arc-randconfig-001-20250503 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250503/202505031738.buFg2SBt-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arc-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250503/202505031738.buFg2SBt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505031738.buFg2SBt-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/trace/trace_branch.c: In function 'probe_likely_condition':
>> kernel/trace/trace_branch.c:56:43: error: implicit declaration of function 'raw_smp_process_id'; did you mean 'raw_smp_processor_id'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
      56 |         if (!tracer_tracing_is_on_cpu(tr, raw_smp_process_id()))
         |                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                                           raw_smp_processor_id


vim +56 kernel/trace/trace_branch.c

    29	
    30	static void
    31	probe_likely_condition(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, int val, int expect)
    32	{
    33		struct trace_array *tr = branch_tracer;
    34		struct trace_buffer *buffer;
    35		struct ring_buffer_event *event;
    36		struct trace_branch *entry;
    37		unsigned long flags;
    38		unsigned int trace_ctx;
    39		const char *p;
    40	
    41		if (current->trace_recursion & TRACE_BRANCH_BIT)
    42			return;
    43	
    44		/*
    45		 * I would love to save just the ftrace_likely_data pointer, but
    46		 * this code can also be used by modules. Ugly things can happen
    47		 * if the module is unloaded, and then we go and read the
    48		 * pointer.  This is slower, but much safer.
    49		 */
    50	
    51		if (unlikely(!tr))
    52			return;
    53	
    54		raw_local_irq_save(flags);
    55		current->trace_recursion |= TRACE_BRANCH_BIT;
  > 56		if (!tracer_tracing_is_on_cpu(tr, raw_smp_process_id()))
    57			goto out;
    58	
    59		trace_ctx = tracing_gen_ctx_flags(flags);
    60		buffer = tr->array_buffer.buffer;
    61		event = trace_buffer_lock_reserve(buffer, TRACE_BRANCH,
    62						  sizeof(*entry), trace_ctx);
    63		if (!event)
    64			goto out;
    65	
    66		entry	= ring_buffer_event_data(event);
    67	
    68		/* Strip off the path, only save the file */
    69		p = f->data.file + strlen(f->data.file);
    70		while (p >= f->data.file && *p != '/')
    71			p--;
    72		p++;
    73	
    74		strscpy(entry->func, f->data.func);
    75		strscpy(entry->file, p);
    76		entry->constant = f->constant;
    77		entry->line = f->data.line;
    78		entry->correct = val == expect;
    79	
    80		trace_buffer_unlock_commit_nostack(buffer, event);
    81	
    82	 out:
    83		current->trace_recursion &= ~TRACE_BRANCH_BIT;
    84		raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
    85	}
    86	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki