[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBeSf__SNkd7goGv@polis>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 18:14:55 +0200
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
kwilczynski@...nel.org, zhiw@...dia.com, cjia@...dia.com,
jhubbard@...dia.com, bskeggs@...dia.com, acurrid@...dia.com,
joelagnelf@...dia.com, ttabi@...dia.com, acourbot@...dia.com,
ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
gary@...yguo.net, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me,
a.hindborg@...nel.org, aliceryhl@...gle.com, tmgross@...ch.edu
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Devres optimization with bound devices
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 04:00:26PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> This patch series implements a direct accessor for the data stored within
> a Devres container for cases where we can prove that we own a reference
> to a Device<Bound> (i.e. a bound device) of the same device that was used
> to create the corresponding Devres container.
Applied to nova-next, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists