[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nco27hnwykffzgirhocskltrkcds32tefkix23nfknf3e5m3zd@mkrrbw6kogsi>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 19:16:35 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Andy Yan <andyshrk@....com>, conor+dt@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, hjc@...k-chips.com, mripard@...nel.org,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, knaerzche@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Convert inno hdmi to drm bridge
On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 04:42:04PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 22. April 2025, 09:04:39 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Andy Yan:
> > From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>
> >
> > When preparing to convert the current inno hdmi driver into a
> > bridge driver, I found that there are several issues currently
> > existing with it:
> >
> > 1. When the system starts up, the first time it reads the EDID, it
> > will fail. This is because RK3036 HDMI DDC bus requires it's PHY's
> > reference clock to be enabled first before normal DDC communication
> > can be carried out.
> >
> > 2. The signal is unstable. When running the glmark2 test on the screen,
> > there is a small probability of seeing some screen flickering.
> > This is because The HSYNC/VSYNC polarity of rk3036 HDMI are controlled
> > by GRF. This part is missing in the current driver.
> >
> > PATCH 1~6 are try to Fix Document in the dt-binding, then add the
> > missing part in driver and dts.
> > PATCH 7 converts the curren driver to drm bridge mode.
>
> After resurrecting my rk3036-kylin which hasn't sucessfully booted in a
> while, I could veryify this series, so on a rk3036-kylin
>
> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
>
>
> I'll probably apply patches 1-4 to drm-misc later today, as that solely
> touches the Rockchip (and only rk3036-)side and patches 5+6 to the
> rockchip tree.
>
> Patch 7 should probably get some attention by people more familiar with
> drm-bridges, so I'll let that sit for a bit longer.
I will take a look later, but on the first glance it looks like there
are too many things going on in that patch, including some unnecessary
fnction movements and define movements, etc. I would kindly ask to split
the non-functional refactorings and the functional ones (splitting to a
library, etc).
>
>
> Thanks a lot for working on all this
> Heiko
>
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists