[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2ace0e9-6565-44c3-84eb-555707f84509@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 19:52:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@...wei.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxarm@...wei.com, mark.rutland@....com,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] of: of_cpu_phandle_to_id to support SMT threads
On 04/05/2025 19:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> In the CPU map, there are two cases that only one occurs at at time.
>> 1) "cpu" = <phandle>
>> 2) "cpus" = <phandle> <index>
>>
>> The first case addresses non-SMTs and the second case addresses SMTs
>> that the variable must be cpu(s) with an index where we later look up
>> the reg array with that.
>>
>> core0 {
>> thread0 {
>> cpus = <&cpu0 0>;
>
> Not so sure, dtschema says only one item is allowed in the phandle and I
> do not see here binding change.
>
> Although this wasn't even sent to me, so I'll just ignore your patchset.
Ah, there was no binding in the patchset, so that's why I did not get
it. Makes sense now, but question about missing binding change stays.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists